WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:20.325
Google just released its May core algorithm update. Right now, we're seeing improvements to Google's scaled AI detection algorithms. We're seeing major Google search console glitches. Local SEO is getting impacted, and there's just general madness in the SEO community. If you don't know, Google core algorithm updates

00:00:20.325 --> 00:00:25.045
are always crazy. Google is literally updating its core algorithms.

00:00:25.125 --> 00:00:32.810
So what we see in the search engine results pages could change a lot. There's always a lot of fear, uncertainty,

00:00:32.810 --> 00:00:35.210
and doubt during core algorithm updates.

00:00:35.290 --> 00:00:46.965
And, you know, this one is no different, but we're going to make sense of it. This update is a two week rollout. It started on May 21, but we have been seeing disturbances

00:00:46.965 --> 00:00:53.445
for days leading up to this. Lots of people were DMing me or posting in communities

00:00:53.445 --> 00:01:08.670
or sharing comments saying, is there an update? Is there an update? My organic traffic is going haywire. What is happening? There has to be an update. And then several days later, Google announces this update. This update is called the Google May

00:01:08.670 --> 00:01:19.345
2026 broad core update, and it is broad. It's affecting lots of different things within Google. Like I said, Google may have improved their scaled AI spam detection algorithms.

00:01:19.425 --> 00:01:27.740
And this is from Goggin Gotra, literally on the day that the update dropped. Goggin said, out of all the AI content hyperscaling

00:01:27.740 --> 00:01:32.220
domains that I have been tracking, AML corp blog subfolder

00:01:32.220 --> 00:02:05.290
seems like it has gotten a manual action today. Everything that they have been scaling in this subfolder over the last couple of months, AI generated content is no longer showing up in the search results. So ALM Corp's entire blog has been dropped from Google. If you just search ALM Corp blog, nothing shows. If you search their exact subfolder in Google, nothing shows. And by I mean, nothing shows when you search their blog, you don't get their blog. You get their homepage, you get Reddit, you get their blog actually in another language,

00:02:05.530 --> 00:02:10.245
but you don't get their English blog. And when you look at the organic

00:02:10.245 --> 00:02:11.045
traffic

00:02:11.045 --> 00:02:14.645
that this blog was getting, it is a crazy

00:02:14.645 --> 00:02:30.260
spike up. One of the just most dramatic spikes in organic traffic. Crazy increase in organic traffic. And when you look at the content, it's really, really, really bad, and it's all AI. It's huge blocks of long paragraphs

00:02:30.260 --> 00:02:37.300
with very few to no images. I'm actually seeing no images, and it's AI generated. It's it's AI text,

00:02:37.685 --> 00:02:44.005
really dense, thick to read, no images except for all of the heading images,

00:02:44.085 --> 00:02:48.885
which are entirely AI. And it's all over the place. Tons of different topics.

00:02:48.965 --> 00:02:52.405
Paul McCartney live. LinkedIn expands ad performance.

00:02:52.810 --> 00:03:12.755
Nike k d 19 times knocked. This is, I mean, this is crazy. Whoever works at all Allm Corp should be listening to this podcast because they would not have done this. I I really can't believe this. And you know what? I was saying earlier, maybe Google has increased its spam detection algorithms, but this one is making so many mistakes.

00:03:12.915 --> 00:03:14.195
Any rudimentary

00:03:14.195 --> 00:03:28.090
AI spam detection algorithm could probably detect this. This is just wild how bad this is, how atrocious this is. It it it is flying in the face of all the known SEO best practices,

00:03:28.170 --> 00:03:48.765
but it did drop again around the time that this May core algorithm update released. So the drop because this this worked for a bit, this scaled for a bit, this drop might be due to this core algorithm update. I mentioned at the start that it looks like local SEO is getting impacted. This is from the digital marketing subreddit.

00:03:48.765 --> 00:04:04.340
User digital nomads h q wrote this. Early observations on the May 2026 core update and directories are getting hammered. The update started rolling out around forty eight hours ago, and the data is already messy. I've been tracking a well known Australian

00:04:03.795 --> 00:04:12.275
directory site that was sitting in positions one through three for basically every near me query you can think of. Plumbers, electricians,

00:04:12.275 --> 00:04:23.690
mechanics, cleaners, the lot. Here's a snapshot from the last forty eight hours. They dropped from position one to position six for plumber near me, losing 3,400

00:04:23.690 --> 00:04:40.625
clicks. They dropped from position one to position 10 for cleaners near me, dropped from position three to position 15 for car detailing near me, just entirely gone from page one for hairdressing near me, and entirely gone for gardening services near me. 75%

00:04:40.625 --> 00:05:41.565
of their near me terms declined. Google's not interested in middlemen for local intent anymore. If someone searches plumber near me, the options are a, show a directory that scraped 50 plumbers off the web, or b, show the actual plumber with 200 reviews and fifteen years of trading history. Google already has maps, business profiles, and AI overviews handling that surface. The directory doesn't add anything to the equation. This looks like information gain in action. The question Google seems to be asking every page, does this add something the rest of the web doesn't already have? Aggregator slash directory content struggles to answer yes. If you run an actual local business, this is probably good news. Google Business Profile is back to being the most important piece of your digital footprint. Still rolling out, so take all of this with a grain of salt. Curious if anyone else is seeing a similar movement. One commenter, proud response eight five five said, been watching this rollout too, and the local business owners I work with are basically celebrating

00:05:41.565 --> 00:05:48.720
right now. One electrician client went from page three to position two for his main keyword overnight.

00:05:48.800 --> 00:06:03.305
The directory thing makes total sense though. Why would Google send someone to a site that just lists 20 plumbers when they can show the actual plumbers Google business profile with real photos, recent reviews, and direct contact information?

00:06:03.385 --> 00:06:27.885
Directories were basically just an extra step in the user journey that didn't need to exist. So local is all over the place. Local directories could be hurting. Now I could actually see directories being relevant in situations or aggregators being relevant in situations where brands are doing a very poor job of giving details on themselves. You see that all the time. Brands that don't know how to do SEO,

00:06:27.885 --> 00:06:33.965
they don't have a lot of information on themselves out on the Internet. Not very often. Directories and aggregators,

00:06:33.965 --> 00:06:42.230
they might put more information or more information in a clear way about these brands than the brands have themselves,

00:06:42.470 --> 00:06:54.355
making it easier for users to understand what a brand is about. And in that situation, a directory could be really valuable. There was another comment in a different subreddit, in the local SEO subreddit,

00:06:54.355 --> 00:07:05.395
about this Google May core update. This one commenter, I am, uh, Nish Kumar Singh said, just saw this two second core update already in 2026,

00:07:05.395 --> 00:07:52.085
and we're not even halfway through this year. Two weeks rollout means rankings will be choppy for a bit, so it's worth telling clients not to panic if they see swings this week. Is anyone already noticing movement in the local pack results, or is it too early? As I mentioned at the start, Google Search Console is also going crazy. Search engine roundtable has an article Google Search Console links report is broken. And it says, and lots of people, lots and lots and lots of people have been reporting this across x, across Reddit, everywhere. Search engine roundtable says, it looks like the Google Search Console link report has gone haywire and is broken pretty badly. Tons of SEOs are seeing zero links in the report, whereas others are seeing huge drops in the link counts in the report. It is not uncommon to see fluctuations,

00:07:52.165 --> 00:08:15.435
even significant ones in the link report. I've been keeping a log recently over here, but this is big, so looks like something significant broke in the code or data where tons of links are dropping out of the report. And this is meaningful because you want to have a lot of backlinks, a lot of links to get authority within Google so you can rank well. Lots of SEOs check this report constantly,

00:08:15.435 --> 00:08:18.075
but this does not mean that the links disappeared.

00:08:18.075 --> 00:08:34.010
They most likely didn't. This means that there's a glitch within Google Search Console at the same time as this May core update. Lots of people are literally just seeing no data in their Google Search Console for their links. Going into search engine roundtable's

00:08:34.010 --> 00:08:40.730
blog posts about this core update, the commenters on the update touch upon the backlinks disappearing

00:08:40.975 --> 00:08:54.880
within Google Search Console, but there's also general chatter just on this core update. I'm gonna share that, but before I share that, I wanna give a warning, which is that I don't think I have ever seen a comment section of search engine roundtable

00:08:54.880 --> 00:09:24.180
that has been SEOs who have been positive about them getting traffic, especially with core updates. The core update comments are always jokes or just we're all dead. SEO is dead. Everything's done. This is the worst. But, I mean, this is some of the streets within SEO, so we wanna just see what the communities are saying. And this is some of the things that they are saying. Just in time for me officially coming back to work after a severe burnout and nervous breakdown,

00:09:24.340 --> 00:09:27.380
first official day back and the traffic tanks.

00:09:27.460 --> 00:10:34.185
Now that's what Google calls a warm welcome. Somebody else said Google organic has been dead for a few years now. Another person said, we should just call it the final nail in the coffin update like someone mentioned in the comments because from here on out, I doubt any of us would care about SEO anymore. Not that I care because I stopped publishing articles for a long time since, but paid ads isn't doing anything too. This line is totally dead. I'm telling you, the comments are always negative within search engine roundtable around core algorithm updates. Personally, I've actually noticed a slight uptick for my websites within Google Search Console. Neither my bottom of funnel nor top of funnel content has seen much volatility, and I've always had the bottom of funnel content be more stable where I have actually experienced volatility on the top of funnel stuff. Top of funnel is informational content. So that could be like how to humanize chatty p t content. That would be an example of a top of funnel search within Google. How to humanize chatty p t content. That's people looking for an answer, not looking to use anything. Or transactional,

00:10:34.345 --> 00:11:02.875
bottom of funnel would be searches like voice notes for dentists or emergency roof repair Austin. Those are people literally looking to use a tool or get in touch with a business. That is bottom of funnel content. Bottom of funnel content is great because when you do it properly, it's completely stable. I always see bottom of funnel content be completely stable. I saw it through Google's helpful content update. I've seen it through every major core update. Bottom of funnel focuses on

00:11:03.115 --> 00:11:09.915
finding searchers who are literally looking to go to a business to use a tool, to buy something,

00:11:10.075 --> 00:11:34.155
to take an action, especially identifying keywords that are going under targeted, where you don't have other businesses vying for the same search terms. That part isn't an aspect of bottom of funnel, but that's the way that I do bottom of funnel. And a lot of bottom of funnel terms are just that way naturally because there's less people at the bottom of the funnel. Because there's less people, there's less search volumes. And because there's less search volumes,

00:11:34.235 --> 00:11:42.235
less marketers bother to target these keywords. So there's less content on the Internet for bottom of funnel searches

00:11:42.235 --> 00:12:09.755
with with that has the most intent. And that makes it easier to rank for these keywords, but then also have stability with your rankings because nobody else is targeting the keywords. I have an entire course on this method of SEO. It's called compact keywords. It's a thing on my shirt. I spent a year making it. I update it several times a month. Last week, I updated it twice, and it is entirely on how to find searchers looking to take action to become customers, users,

00:12:09.915 --> 00:12:12.635
or call a business, how to make pages

00:12:12.715 --> 00:12:18.930
that rank and convert these searchers at the same time, how to build links, how to do a technical audit,

00:12:19.170 --> 00:12:24.530
so much in this course. If you haven't checked it out yet, you will love it. It's at compactkeywords.com.

00:12:24.610 --> 00:13:03.395
These are four reviews I got on the twenty first. One person said, if you are tired of SEO advice that sounds smart but never translates into actual customers, this is the one. It is built around how buyers actually search, not how marketers wish they would search. Buy it. Somebody else said, I completed the course, but I would say it's the correct way to do SEO. Another person said, concise and straight to the point. And the last person said, I bought the course earlier today, and I'm on the on page SEO videos. This is a super comprehensive SEO course. Great work. Thank you everybody for those reviews. Thank you everyone who's gotten the course so far. Again, that is at compactkeywords.com.

00:13:03.395 --> 00:13:09.760
That is everything for this episode of the Edward show. This is my daily search engine optimization podcast.

00:13:09.840 --> 00:13:24.795
One thousand fifty four days in a row doing this show. No days missed. If you watch us on YouTube, thank you so much for watching. If you listened on Spotify or Apple podcasts, thank you so much for listening. And I will talk to you again tomorrow.

00:13:24.795 --> 00:13:25.035
Bye.
